Tornado.cash is one of the most popular cryptocurrency mixing protocols. It has announced that the project will be deployed on Arbitrum One’s L2 (layer 2) Ethereum platform. The creators of the Ethereum-based mixture application explained that users will be able to enjoy cheaper transactions by settling on Arbitrum.
Tornado.cash to Deploy on Arbitrum – ‘Cheaper Transactions Being the Biggest Comparative Advantage’
On November 29, the team behind the ethereum mixing application Tornado.cash revealed the project plans to deploy on the Arbitrum One network. This news comes after the team behind Tornado.cash announced that they plan to deploy on the Arbitrum One network. This week, total deposits for Tornado.cash on the Xdai chain crossed $1 million. In terms of ether deposited since the project’s inception, the protocol has taken in 2,222,007 ether, or $4.3 billion.
Tornado.cash increases ether transfer privacy through the breaking of onchain links between source and destination addresses. Zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) are required to verify that deposits and withdrawals do not link to each other. Tornado.cash is just over two years old as it was introduced in August 2019. The project even got the former Bitcoin Core developer, Gavin Andresen, to notice the ether mixing protocol in mid-January 2020.
On May 13, Tornado.cash developers destroyed their private keys using a process called multi-party computation (MPC). This scheme enabled Tornado.cash developers without the need for a developer’s private keys to release the smart contract to the community. “With a record 1114 contributions this was by far the largest Trusted Setup Ceremony to date. By comparison, all other trusted setup ceremonies had less than 200 participants,” the Tornado.cash team explained in the blog post.
Arbitrum is an L2 solution that leverages optimistic rollups and Arbitrum users benefit by using ethereum (ETH), its token derivatives, and smart contracts for a fraction of the cost. Statistics from l2fees.info show that the average ethereum transaction can cost $7. 08 while using Arbitrum the same transfer would cost $2.81. While transferring ERC20 tokens could cost $16. 19 using L1 (layer 1), L2 fees using Arbitrum to transfer a token will cost $3.09.
Swapping tokens is the most expensive onchain (L1) transaction costing around $35. 41 per transaction. Arbitrum users can swap tokens for $4. 85 per transfer according to today’s l2fees.info metrics. The Tornado.cash blog post says that “the protocol’s smart contracts are all set and ready to spin on Arbitrum.” The biggest advantage to using Tornado.cash with Arbitrum is data transfer costs.
“Settling with Arbitrum will enable Tornado.cash customers to take advantage all the benefits that a Layer 2 has to offer, with lower transactions being the greatest comparative advantage,” the blog post from the team highlights. This proposal is part the protocol’s ongoing improvement and will allow more users to exercise their privacy rights. Moreover, with this deployment, Tornado.cash will join a thriving ecosystem composed of multiple other defi applications.”
This story contains tags
Arbitrum, Arbitrum One, Crypto Mixing, ETH fees, ether, Ether swaps, Ethereum, Ethereum (ETH), Fees, Gavin Andresen, L1, L2, l2fees.info, Layer 1, layer 2, Mixing Crypto, Onchain, onchain fees, optimistic rollups, Privacy, privacy crypto, private, Tornado cash, Transfer Fees
What do you think about the crypto mixing application Tornado.cash deploying on Arbitrum? ![Ciphertrace Announces Enhanced Monero Tracing Capabilities for Governments](https://static.news.bitcoin.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/monero.jpg)
What do you think about the crypto mixing application Tornado.cash deploying on Arbitrum?
Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. This article is not intended to be a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any products or services. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. The author and the company are not responsible for any loss or damage resulting from or in connection to the content, goods, or services discussed in this article.
Read More