Recently, the Ethereum network has been subject to a lot criticism regarding its data transfer fees and scalability. Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Ethereum, discussed plans for scaling, the proof-of-stake transition and censorship resistance in a blog post titled “Endgame” published December 6.
Buterin Outlines a Plausible Ethereum Scaling Plan in Endgame Blog Post
Vitalik Buterin, the prominent co-founder of the Ethereum project, has outlined his thoughts about a “plausible roadmap” that could address the network’s scaling issues. The blog post dubbed “Endgame,” explains a few concepts like a “second tier of staking with low resource requirements,” and introducing fraud proofs or Zk-Snarks where ETH users can “cheaply” acquire block validity. Buterin’s roadmap summarizes the goals of improving blockchain without sacrificing censorship resistance.
” What do we do after all this? In his blog post, Buterin asks: “What do we get after all of this?” “We get a chain in which block production is still centralized, but block validation and trustlessness are highly decentralized and specialized anti-censorship magical prevents block producers from censoring,” Buterin adds.
It’s somewhat aesthetically ugly, but it does provide the basic guarantees that we are looking for: even if every single one of the primary stakers (the block producers) is intent on attacking or censoring, the worst that they could do is all go offline entirely, at which point the chain stops accepting transactions until the community pools their resources and sets up one primary-staker node that is honest.
Buterin discusses an Ethereum Rollup Central Roadmap, Big Block Chains and Cross-Domain EEVs
Buterin’s recent blog post follows the discussions that took place at the end of November when Ethereum developers talked about concepts such as EIP-4488. The plan could reduce data transfer costs five times less, and Ethereum developer Tim Beiko shared his thoughts on EIP-4488 and lowering the costs of rollups. Buterin also discussed leveraging rollups in the Endgame blog post and this technology’s possible long-term future .”
.
“Ethereum has the ability to adapt to this future world, even with all of its uncertainties,” Buterin says. “The profound benefit of the Ethereum rollup-centric roadmap is that it means that Ethereum is open to all of the futures, and does not have to commit to an opinion about which one will necessarily win.” Buterin further added:
Ethereum researchers should think hard about what levels of decentralization in block production are actually achievable. If cross-domain MEV or even cross-shard MEVs from one rollup taking over multiple shards, it is not worth the effort to make highly decentralized block-production easy.
In terms of “big block chains” Buterin says “there is a path for them to turn into something trustless and censorship-resistant, and we’ll soon find out if their core developers and communities actually value censorship resistance and decentralization enough for them to do it.” Buterin’s blog post ends by saying that “it will likely take years for all of this to play out.”
Sharding, data availability sampling and Sharding are difficult technologies to implement. People will need to refine their knowledge and perform audits before they feel comfortable with storing assets in a ZK rollup that runs a full EVM.” Buterin concludes his Endgame post. Cross-domain MEV research is also still in its infancy. It is becoming clearer how realistic and bright a future for scalable Blockchains looks .”
This story contains tags
calldata, Developers, EIP-4488, ETH, ether, Ether fees, Ethereum (ETH), Ethereum blockchain, fee reduction, Gas, gas costs, L1, L1 fees, L2, L2 fees, Optimism, pruning, reducing fees, rollup transactions, rollups, Scaling, technology, Tim Beiko, Vitalik Buterin, Zksync
What do you think about Vitalik Buterin’s Engame blog post concerning scaling and possible roadmaps? Please comment below to let us know your thoughts on this topic.
Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. This article is not intended to be a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any products or services. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. The author and the company are not responsible for any loss or damage resulting from or in connection to the content, goods, or services discussed in this article.
Read More