Many users are concerned about possible censorship at protocol level due to the upcoming consensus change Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency market cap, plans to implement in September. Blacklisted addresses will not be allowed to transact in or operate in base layer . even if they interact directly with smart contract.
Incoming merge event triggers Worries in Crypto Circles
The Merge, Ethereum’s migration from a proof-of-work (PoW) to a proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus algorithm has raised concerns about the future of the chain when it comes to censorship. After the addresses of the smart contracts of Tornado Cash, a privacy-centered mixing protocol, were sanctioned and blacklisted by the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, the privacy and censorship-resistant character of Ethereum has been in the spotlight.
Gabriel Shapiro, the general counselor at Delphi Digital, believes that big validators of Ethereum will try to push for a measure that brings censorship to a protocol level. This would allow them operate in compliance and avoid penalties for not including illegal transactions. He stated that these entities cannot self-help by simply avoiding blocks containing U.S. sanctioned transactions. However, they may be severely slashed .”
if they do so
Discusfish, the co-founder and CEO of F2pool (ethereum/bitcoin mining pool operation), stated that proof-of work (PoW), consensus assets are more capable of coping with regulatory pressure than their proofstake-based counterparts. He explained:
In the current discussion on PoS and PoW, one important point to focus on is whether the block producer can keep his identity anonymous and package transactions that conform to consensus on the chain. This may include sensitive transactions. While PoW is capable of doing it at the moment, PoS faces certain challenges due to the need for the chain assets to be staked.
Different Views
However, not all people agree with this view. Some people believe that proof-of–stake consensus-based assets such as Ethereum after The Merge, are more prepared for a censorship attack from government regulators. Justin Bons, Cybercapital’s founder and CIO, is one of these people.
Bons claims that, while it would be difficult to attack Bitcoin and Ethereum with this type of attack, the complexity and physical presence PoW-based chains require to function would make them more easy to target than proofs-of-stake assets. PoS is able to be operated from anywhere in the world with low-power equipment.
Finally, Bons believes that regulators are not out to hurt cryptocurrencies yet and that “a sane middle ground must be found which preserves the credible neutrality of blockchains, ensuring privacy for individuals and compliance for companies.”
This story contains tags
censored, censors, Censorship, Cybercapital, discusfish, Ethereum, F2Pool, gabriel shapiro, Justin Bons, OFAC, Privacy, proof of stake. cryptocurrency, Proof of Work, protocol, Tornado cash
What do you think about the possibility of censorship happening in Ethereum at a protocol level? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.
Sergio Goschenko
Sergio is a Venezuelan cryptocurrency journalist. He describes himself as late to the game, entering the cryptosphere when the price rise happened during December 2017. He is a computer engineer by trade, living in Venezuela and having been impacted by the cryptocurrency boom on a social level. This gives him a unique perspective about crypto success and how it benefits the underbanked and unbanked.
Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. This article is not intended to be a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any products or services. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. The author and the company are not responsible for any loss or damage resulting from or in connection to the content, goods, or services discussed in this article.
Read More